Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Michael Simmons v. R. Ground
as 11-15850
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY SIMMONS
Respondent - Appellee:
R. GROUNDS, Warden
Simmons v. Grounds
as 3:2010cv03002
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Simmons
Respondent:
R. Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Orangeburg-Calhoun Detention Center et al
as 6:2010cv00367
Defendant:
Orangeburg-Calhoun Detention Center, County 38 and Willie Bamberg
Plaintiff:
Dustin Anthony Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00540
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simmons
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LEE v. MILLER, ESQ. et al
as 2:2009cv04837
Petitioner:
GRACE LEE
Respondent:
W. LANE MILLER, ESQ., THOMAS AMBROSIO, ESQ., ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andre Anthony Simmons v. M Evans
as 5:2009cv00538
Petitioner:
Andre Anthony Simmons
Respondent:
M Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIck Simmons, et al v. Willie Mitchell, et al
as 08-56318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICK ANTHONY SIMMONS, an individual and CALIFORNIA CLAIM CONSULTANTS, INC., a corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE D. MITCHELL, an individual, AKA Bill Mitchell, DBA Mitchell and Company Public Adjusters and Claim Consultants and BM ADJUSTING, INC., DBA Mitchell and Company Public Adjusters and Claim Consultants
Simmons v. Harris
as 4:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simmons
Defendant:
Deanne Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Simmons v. Currey
as 3:2007cv04537
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Simmons
Defendant:
Ben Currey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Berghuis
as 2:2007cv13216
Petitioner:
Anthony Simmons
Respondent:
Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
