Cases 51 - 60 of 1,651
Cordon v. Braggs
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Susie Cordon
Defendant:
Michael Braggs
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sparkman v. Bragg et al
as 6:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Dylan J. Sparkman
Defendant:
Bradley Bragg, Troy Christensen and Daniel Bruno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keltner v. Dutton et al
as 6:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Shawn Keltner
Defendant:
Leo Dutton and Captain Bragg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathy Bragg v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 23-14172
Plaintiff:
CATHY ANN BRAGG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Donald Ames
as 23-7291
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
DONALD F. AMES, Warden, JASON BRAGG, Unit Manager, RICHARD TONEY, Captain and others
Guzman v. Building Service 32BJ Pension Fund
as 23-8032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS J. GUZMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BUILDING SERVICE 32BJ PENSION FUND, PETER GOLDBERGER, Executive Director of the Fund, KYLE BRAGG, as Union Trustee and others
Defendant:
RONALD RAAB, Legal Counsel 32BJ Fund
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kisliuk v. City of Fort Bragg et al
as 1:2023cv06358
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kisliuk
Defendant:
City of Fort Bragg, Thomas O'Neal, Jarod Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
