Cases 51 - 60 of 11,894
Gonzalez v. Herrera, et al.
as 24-2371
Petitioner:
LEON ABEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JUAN HERRERA, Bureau of Prisons Residential Reentry Manager for Long Beach, in his official capacity and COLLETTE PETERS, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in her official capacity
Martin v. Call et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Donald Lynn Martin
Respondent:
Matt Call and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Altenburger v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2024cv02966
Plaintiff:
Bruce Altenburger
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2024cv02978
Plaintiff:
Jayson McNeil
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2024cv02990
Plaintiff:
Esther Welsh
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Numann v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Gregory Numann
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03092
Plaintiff:
Noel Davila
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mark Carter v. BOP
as 24-5082
Plaintiff:
Mark Carter
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office
Carrillo v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Unknown Party, Pam Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
