Cases 51 - 60 of 6,438
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Chapman David v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06214
Plaintiff:
Amber J Chapman David
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carr, Jazemine Adams, Brandon D Alexander-Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Chapman v. USA
as 3:2024cv00376
Petitioner:
Ishmeel Qyshawn Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chapman v. Mnuchin
as 1:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Josh Chapman
Respondent:
Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chapman v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Michael Chapman
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Chapman et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2024cv00463
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chapman and Michelle Chapman
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
(SS) Chapman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Leslie A. Chapman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Chapman v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Francine Chapman
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
