Cases 51 - 60 of 17,393
Gregory Turley v. Justin Hammers, et al
as 24-1889
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. TURLEY
Defendant:
JUSTIN HAMMERS, CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden, MARK WILLIAMS and others
Eugene Baker, et al v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, et al
as 24-5490
Plaintiff:
EUGENE BAKER, LESTER BAKER, PATRICIA BAKER and others
Defendant:
BLACKHAWK MINING, LLC and PINE BRANCH MINING, LLC
Capell, et al v. U.S. Postal Service, et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Eric F. Capell and Christine E. Garren
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and Cynthia Millard Staton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Property Damage
Burke v. Chicago Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv04116
Plaintiff:
Christine Burke
Defendant:
Chicago Public Schools, Chicago Board Of Education, Human Resources Department of the Chicago Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Spengler v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant:
FREDERICK D. WILLIAMS, Dr.; individual capacity, ZUNIGA, Ms.; individual capacity, HIMAYA, RN; individual capacity and others
United States v. Gray
as 24-8033
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMANDA CHRISTINE GRAY
Forney v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02615
Plaintiff:
Christine Forney
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
