Cases 51 - 60 of 115
James Barfield v. Kevin Rambosk, et al
as 15-12263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FRED BARFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, In his official capacity as Sheriff of Collier County, Florida, KEVIN RAMBOSK, In his official capacity as Sheriff of Collier County, Florida, MICHAEL C. DIPAOLO, individually and others
Peyser v. Alexander Capital Markets, LLC et al
as 4:2014mc00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Peyser
Defendant:
Alexander Capital Markets, LLC, William D Chapman, Aura Financial Services, Inc and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv22460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Christopher Davis v. Johnatan Chapman, et al
as 14-30244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DAMONE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNATAN D. CHAPMAN and MONROE POLICE SNAP/METT TEAM
Barfield v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2013cv00566
Plaintiff:
James Fred Barfield
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk , Michael C. Dipaolo , James D. Casey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Chapman et al
as 3:2012cv03356
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Annette D. Chapman and Harold L. Chapman
Cause Of Action: Mortgage Foreclosure
Rosales -v- Fisher, et al.,
as 6:2012cv06563
Plaintiff:
Luis Rosales
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Lester N. Wright, Carl J. Koengsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. Uribe et al
as 3:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
Jerry Eugene Best
Defendant:
D. Uribe, D. Zanchi, D. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
