Cases 51 - 60 of 146
Daniel v. Hoya Optical
as 3:2019cv01740
Defendant:
Hoya Optical
Plaintiff:
David Daniel, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster et al v. Department of the Navy
as 3:2019cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Foster and Barbara A. Foster
Defendant:
Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stellar Restoration Services, LLC v. Shreveport Celebration Church et al
as 4:2019cv00372
Defendant:
David Daniel and Shreveport Celebration Church
Plaintiff:
Stellar Restoration Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brunner v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00750
Defendant:
C Okezie, Illinois Department of Corrections, Joe Shayne and others
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Brunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipian v. University of Michigan et al
as 2:2018cv13321
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lipian
Defendant:
University of Michigan and David Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DANIELS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01940
Plaintiff:
DAVID DANIELS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunner v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02901
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Brunner
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc., Estate of Dr. Saleh Obaisi, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roper v. Armor Correctional Health Inc et al
as 0:2017cv61910
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Roper
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Inc, Armor Medical Vendor and Karen Mizramy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. David Magness
as 17-14323
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID DANIEL MAGNESS
Bell et al v. Tri-State Careflight, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
Kristy Bell , Deborah Berest , Daniel Bergman and others
Defendant:
Tri-State Careflight, LLC and Blake A. Stamper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
