Cases 51 - 60 of 242
West Congress Street Partners, v. Rivertown Development, LLC, et al
as 17-1941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WEST CONGRESS STREET PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
RIVERTOWN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, CITY OF DETROIT, MI, RIVERTOWN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Souiri v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Souiri
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Delaware County District Attorney, Maggie McBane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Jones, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Dedric Jamar Dean
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Ventress Correctional Facility, E. Laster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. United States Government Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv02111
Plaintiff:
Maurese Bey
Defendant:
United States Government Corporation, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jarrett Hamilton v. City of New Albany, Indiana, et al
as 16-3901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARRETT HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW ALBANY, INDIANA, PAUL SPEIGHTS, DAVID BREWER and others
Ghareeb et al v. Fant et al
as 2:2016cv13502
Plaintiff:
Janet Ghareeb and Dennis Smith
Defendant:
Michael T Fant and Michael T Fant, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ronald Forgue v. City of Chicago, et al
as 16-2857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD FORGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, GARRY MCCARTHY, Superintendent, DENNIS SMITH, Sergeant and others
Cunningham v. Bates et al
as 4:2016cv00793
Plaintiff:
Kristy Cunningham
Defendant:
Leona Bates , Dennis Smith , David Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03957
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Smith and Dennis Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Rantz
as 6:2016cv03154
Plaintiff:
Dennis Smith and Ruby Smith
Defendant:
Clell Rantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
