Cases 51 - 60 of 124
Smith v. Scotland County Detention Center et al
as 5:2019ct03060
Defendant:
Scotland County Detention Center and Capt. B. J. Knight
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Willie Smith
as 19-10224
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIE DEWAYNE SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01368
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ercel Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Smith v. Rawson et al
as 1:2019cv00053
Plaintiff:
Chadlen DeWayne Smith
Defendant:
Matt Keeler, Dylan Hobson, Judy Mesick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv05889
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Jason Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Walker et al
as 4:2018cv04111
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion, Warden Jeffie Walker and Corporal Brown
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orlando Lewayne Pilcher v. Ricky Bank et al
as 5:2018cv01392
Defendant:
David Sanders, Dewayne Smith, Stephen P. Nick and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Lewayne Pilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Mississippi et al
as 5:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deshawn Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Barry Dillion and Kelvin Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-70020
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Demetrius Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-70015
Petitioner - Appellee:
DEMETRIUS DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellant:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
