Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Joe Robinson v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10598
Petitioner - Appellant: JOE EARL ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Robinson v. William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01640
Petitioner: Joe Earl Robinson
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. State of Texas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01422
Plaintiff: Joe Earl Robinson
Respondent: State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kenneth Robinson v. Alvin Keller, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-7546
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH EARL ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee: ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Robinson et al v. Citifinancial, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv11246
Plaintiff: Earl Robinson and Indera Robinson
Defendant: Citifinancial, Inc. and Unknown Trustee, as Trustee on behalf of the asset-backed-security in which the Mortgage at issue was pooled
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Keller
as 5:2012hc02028
Petitioner: Kenneth Earl Robinson
Respondent: Alvin W. Keller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. KELLER
as 1:2012cv00053
Petitioner: KENNETH EARL ROBINSON
Respondent: ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Thaler
as 3:2010cv00557
Petitioner: Michael Earl Robinson
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Robinson v. Grady Hayne We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-6616
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH EARL ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee: GRADY J. HAYNES, LYNN HENRY and JANET POWELL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?