Cases 51 - 60 of 2,018
United States of America v. All Dogs Located at 12111 SC-102, Patrick South Carolina 29584, Chesterfield County Parcel ID #216-000-000-020-the residence of Donald E. Griggs ("GRIGGS PROPERTY 1") et al
as 4:2023cv05577
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Dogs Located at 12111 SC-102, Patrick South Carolina 29584, Chesterfield County Parcel ID #216-000-000-020-the residence of Donald E. Griggs ("GRIGGS PROPERTY 1") and All Dogs Located at Chesterfield County Parcel ID# 216-000-000-019 - a property used by Griggs and adjacent to GRIGGS PROPERTY 1 ("GRIGGS PROPERTY 2")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 86,766.00 USDT
as 1:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
86,766.00 USDT seized from OKX account UUID ending 5504 and ID Number '097799 with affiliated deposit address ending 94d8 and 86,766.00 USDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
White et al v. Pension Benefit Information, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12512
Plaintiff:
Diane White, Sabela Portillo and Rebecca Iddings
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC doing business as PBI Research Services and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
USA v. All Virtual Currency in Binance Account with User ID XXXX3527
as 1:2023cv02880
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Virtual Currency in Binance Account with User ID XXXX3527
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2023md03083
Plaintiff:
Shavonne Diggs, Brady Bradberry, Christina Bradberry and others
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Maximus Federal Services, Inc., The Berwyn Group, Inc. and others
Hyduk v. Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307 et al
as 3:2023cv01801
Plaintiff:
Jayne Hyduk
Defendant:
Medi-cal Benefits Id No.93095289g92307, California Department Of Healthcare Services, Washington DC Department Of Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
USA v. 12,324.84 USDT Seized from Binance.com User ID # 2974 in the name of Duean Phikunkaew et al
as 1:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
12,324.84 USDT Seized from Binance.com User ID # 2974 in the name of Duean Phikunkaew, Cryptocurrency Seized from Binance.com User ID # 0476 in the name of Varat Vitthayanuwat, Cryptocurrency Seized from Binance.com User ID # 5033 in the name of Wang Xuewen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 0.40401694 Bitcoin (BTC) seized from Binance user ID 36895141 et al
as 1:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
0.40401694 Bitcoin (BTC) seized from Binance user ID 36895141, 59,911.36 Tether (USDT), seized from Binance User ID 20891886, 9,128.847 Tether (USDT), seized from Binance User Id 18211927 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 303,992.547 USDT AND 100.896 BNB SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID xxxx4375 ON APRIL 13, 2023 et al
as 1:2023cv12193
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
303,992.547 USDT AND 100.896 BNB SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID xxxx4375 ON APRIL 13, 2023 and 108,551.008 USDT SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID xxxxx5891 ON APRIL 13, 2023
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Any and All Virtual Currency, Funds, Monies, and other things of value stored in or accessible at Binance associated with User ID 165978850 et al
as 2:2023cv02583
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Any and All Virtual Currency, Funds, Monies, and other things of value stored in or accessible at Binance associated with User ID 165978850
Claimant:
Suneet Gautam and Mary Katherine Geneva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
