Cases 51 - 60 of 247
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66856
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. CRAFTON et al
as 4:2020cv00048
Defendant:
CRAFTON, SCHAFFER, WINGARD and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. JONES, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23305
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD v. STOCKS et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Defendant:
RICHARD FAUNTLEROY, LATIFA HOWELL, MONIQUE A. BURTON and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward-Malone v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv04075
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher J Ward-Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WARD v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00460
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
PENNY J. WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Woods et al
as 4:2019cv04212
Plaintiff:
Damien J Ward, III
Defendant:
Roderic T Woods, Stephanie Dorethy and . Hillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virginia Uranium, Inc. et al v. McAuliffe et al
as 4:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Virginia Uranium, Inc., Coles Hill, LLC, Bowen Minerals, LLC and others
Defendant:
Terry McAuliffe, Maurice Jones, Conrad Spangler and others
Amicus Curiae:
Roanoke River Basin Association and Dan River Basin Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Christopher Ward-Malone v. United States
as 19-1986
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Ward-Malone
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
