Cases 51 - 60 of 135
Bohrer v. Sandridge Energy Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01239
Plaintiff:
John L Bohrer
Defendant:
Sandridge Energy Inc, Tom Ward, James D Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
James Davis Bennett v. United States of America
as 8:2014cv01757
Petitioner:
James Davis Bennett
Respondent:
United States of America
Unknown:
Diana L Pauli
Bennett v. Feathers et al
as 3:2014cv01667
Plaintiff:
James J. Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Feathers and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James Davis Bennett v. Jaspal Dhaliwal, MD et al
as 2:2014cv04697
Plaintiff:
James Davis Bennett
Defendant:
E. Casino, Jaspal Dhaliwal, Does and others
Miller et al v. McCloud et al
as 1:2014cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Miller , Terance M. Maher , Max H. Owen and others
Defendant:
Harold S. McCloud , Debra A. McCloud and Thomas J. Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pauli v. Kingdom Iron Designs et al
as 4:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Luis Gerardo Pauli
Defendant:
Kingdom Iron Designs, Francisco Javier Labrador Vera, Kristy Marie Wolcott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv25220
Plaintiff:
Dianna Bennett and James W. Bennett
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00559
Petitioner:
James Lee Bennett
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Executive Director-TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunt v. Calhoun County Bank, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
William H. G. Hunt, Sr.
Defendant:
Calhoun County Bank, Inc. and James L. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bennett v. Warden Correctional Reception Center
as 1:2013cv00519
Petitioner:
James L. Bennett
Respondent:
Warden Correctional Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
