Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Davis v. CIGNA Corporation d/b/a CIGNA Group Insurance
as 5:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
James Garrett "G Davis
Defendant:
CIGNA Corporation d/b/a CIGNA Group Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Garrett v. Union Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2010cv00393
Plaintiff:
James Garrett
Defendant:
Union Parish Detention Center, Brazzel, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Bagley et al v. Albright et al
as 2:2009cv04215
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Jackson-Bagley and Darryl W. Bagley
Defendant:
George Barton Albright, Jr., Kenneth B McClain, Humphrey Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrett v. Warden
as 2:2009cv00767
Petitioner:
James Garrett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Patterson et al
as 2:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Max Barnes, Jr
Defendant:
Thomas E. Patterson, Steven Turley, Bruce Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WOHL et al v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA et al
as 1:2008cv00149
Defendant:
CITY OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA and JAMES GARRETT
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOHL and DIANA OSBORN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
James Garrett v. Gary Sandor
as 08-55596
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES GARRETT
Respondent - Appellee:
W. A. DUNCAN, Warden and GARY SANDOR, Acting Warden
Garrett v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2007cv01672
Plaintiff:
James Garrett
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert v. Garrett et al (MAG+)
as 3:2007cv00625
Plaintiff:
Hewitt P. Robert, Jr.
Defendant:
James Garrett, Sue Bell Cobb, Frend See, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warden et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2007cv02704
Plaintiff:
Dimmie Warden and James Garrett
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
