Cases 51 - 60 of 134
Ortiz v. Fluor Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Juan Ortiz
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises Incorporated , Fluor Canada Ltd. , Jacobs Engineering Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bartlett v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Allegan County Court, Kalamazoo County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05828
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munguia et al v. Westaub II LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04180
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Munguia and Juan Ortiz
Defendant:
Westaub II LLC , Antoine Westermann and Francis Staub
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ortiz v. Bell County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00542
Defendant:
Bell County Jail, Bell County Jailer, TDCJ - ID and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Bell County Jail et al
as 6:2017cv00154
Defendant:
Bell County Jail, Bell County Jailer, TDCJ - ID and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gloria Bustillos v. El Paso County Hospital Dist, et al
as 17-50022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLORIA BUSTILLOS
Defendant - Appellee:
EL PASO COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, FRANK MENDEZ and others
Ortiz et al v. City of Cleveland
as 1:2016cv02529
Plaintiff:
Juan Ortiz and Ramon L. Ortiz
Defendant:
City of Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Charles v. Ortiz et al
as 2:2016cv04929
Plaintiff:
Kente Charles
Defendant:
Diago Ortiz, Juan Ortiz and Robinson Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. COLVIN
as 5:2016cv03591
Plaintiff:
JUAN ORTIZ
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
