Cases 51 - 60 of 528
US v. Joshua Lankford
as 22-4234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA I. LANKFORD, a/k/a 20-20, a/k/a 20, a/k/a Light Bright, a/k/a Yellow
Lankford v. Bradley et al
as 2:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lankford
Defendant:
Jody Bradley, Todd Thomas, M Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ralph Baker v. Michael Wittevrongel, et al
as 22-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WITTEVRONGEL, CITY OF UNION TOWNSHIP, SGT. RANDY STRATTON and others
Defendant:
JENNIFER F. BANAAG, YOLANDA CICCONE, FRANCIS P. BARLETTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dante Maurice Lankford v. Heather Shirley
as 5:2021cv02169
Petitioner:
Dante Maurice Lankford
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Estate of John C. West, Jr. v. Thomas et al
as 1:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
Estate of John C. West, Jr.
Defendant:
V. Thomas Thomas, Lankford & Reed, PLLC and Thomas Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
