Cases 51 - 60 of 589
El v. Mattingly et al
as 4:2021cv01357
Plaintiff:
Nizza P. El
Defendant:
Pat Mattingly and Maureen Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Delarosa v. Euristi et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Javier Delarosa
Defendant:
B Euristi, Canales, Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FILING ERROR
as 7:2021cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jordan Jones
Defendant:
Edward Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Mattingly v. Raytheon Company et al
as 4:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Darren Mattingly
Defendant:
Raytheon Company, AIG Claims, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mattingly v. Adair Co Circuit Court
as 1:2021cv00137
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Mattingly
Respondent:
Adair Co Circuit Court and Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bensfield v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Deborah Elizabeth Bensfield
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center, Owensboro Police Department, Daviess County Sheriffs Dept. Post 16 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTINGLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49584
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MATTINGLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUTSLAR et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
DELBERT S. GADDIS, III, AARON MATTINGLY, CODY FIELDS and others
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Mattingly et al
as 8:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
Dylan Thomas and Austin E. Lightfeather
Defendant:
Gabrial Mattingly, Sarpy County Sheriffs Department, Lincoln Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
