Cases 51 - 60 of 4,065
McBride v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Darnell McBride
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hagans v. Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03023
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Hagans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Talley v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv50150
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Joseph Jennings, Lt. McBride, Andrea Tack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkland v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
LaDarius Cordell Kirkland
Defendant:
William Anderson and Unknown McBride
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
John McBride
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
McBride v. Collier
as 24-50274
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice
El et al v. Williamson, II et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Kenyata Ibn McBride Saadi El and Elite Transportation of the Carolinas, LLC
Defendant:
Curtis Deleon Williamson, II and PGT Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Enge
as 1:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Warden Jamadre L. Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
