Cases 51 - 60 of 241
Fields et al v. King et al
as 2:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Melissa Fields and Michael A. Nichols
Defendant:
Roane County Commission, Sheriff L. Todd Cole and Deputy Sheriff Michael King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALVEY et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
as 3:2020cv00263
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M DAUBY, FAYE KING, LYNNE RICE and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. King et al
as 6:2020cv00574
Plaintiff:
Dustin Reynolds
Defendant:
Michael King, Joe Carter and Steve Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01558
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYELAND MICHAEL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dayter v. Czerwinski et al
as 9:2020cv01151
Defendant:
Dilon Cody, Officer Zackary Knobloc, Officer Adam Smaldon and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Dayter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards et al v. Pruitt et al
as 7:2020cv01400
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, Margo Bryan, Michael King and others
Plaintiff:
Alabama - Mississippi Farm Inc, Luke Edwards, Apostolic Advancement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. King et al
as 4:2020cv00691
Plaintiff:
Dustin Reynolds
Defendant:
Michael King, Joe Carter and Steve Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Martha Castillo, Michael Welty, Michael King and others
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Guzman Santos, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC et al
as 1:2020cv23521
Defendant:
Inc Pfizer, SANOFI US SERVICES INC, CHATTEM, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30187
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MICHAEL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
