Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Arnold et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 3:2009cv04157
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Arnold, Wendall Anderson, Robert Armstrong and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Arnold et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 4:2009cv04157
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Arnold , Wendall Anderson , Robert Armstrong and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP , AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Armstrong v. Lauderdale County Jail et al
as 4:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Robert Armstrong
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Jail, Lauderdale Kitchen Dept. and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunt et al v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2009cv00038
Plaintiff:
C. David Hunt and Carol Santangelo
Defendant:
Robert Armstrong, Amy Armstrong and Harbor Ridge Townhouse Condominium Association
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Torns v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 08-61044
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES TORNS, JR., also known as Charles Torns
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and ROBERT ARMSTRONG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carl Armstrong v. City of Melvindale, et al
as 08-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL ROBERT ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MELVINDALE
Defendant:
DAVID FOBAR, KAREN PLANTS and JOHN DOE, 1-3
Robert Armstrong v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-69432
Plaintiff:
Robert Armstrong
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co
ARMSTRONG v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv70954
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
