Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Gerard Morrison v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 14-2308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD MORRISON, CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, ELTON POLEN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
GARY DIZE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VA
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Reginald Johnson v. Telfair State Prison
as 14-14064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TELFAIR STATE PRISON
Johnson v. Telfair State Prison
as 3:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Geo Care et al
as 2:2014cv00972
Defendant:
Wendy Barnes, Lorin Fishmon, Geo Care and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Larochelle
as 14-2164
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Larochelle, Eric Finger, Fritz Bonaventure, AKA Freak and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Brandon Lisi
Johnson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07173
Plaintiff:
Nicole Agostini and Reginald Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, Vincenzo DeMartino, David Grieco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson et al v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 1:2013cv01362
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson , Elton Polen, Jr. , David Conrad and others
Defendant:
County of Fairfax, VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reginald Johnson v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 13-4105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY and KENNETH A. OSOKOW
Reginald Johnson v. Chairman PA Board of Probation
as 13-4106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAIRMAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
