Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Walters v. USA
as 5:2016cv00409
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael S. Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. Eckard et al
as 1:2015cv01411
Plaintiff:
Arnold J. Harris
Defendant:
J. A. Eckard, B. Hollibaugh and W. S. Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralston v. Rowland et al
as 1:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Steven Ralston
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Debra Wagonschutz, Robin S. Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters et al v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Robert S Walters and Irene Walters
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Walter v. Standard Insurance Company
as 4:2014cv00921
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Walter
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Candace Walters v. Odyssey Healthcare Management, et al
as 14-16930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CANDACE S. WALTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ODYSSEY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and ODYSSEY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
Martinez et al v. Walters
as 1:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez and Socorro Martinez
Defendant:
Annette S Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walter v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11951
Plaintiff:
Victoria S. Walter
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cessna Finance Corporation v. Wings Air, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv01090
Plaintiff:
Cessna Finance Corporation
Defendant:
Wings Air, LLC , Javier V. Diaz and Amy S. Walter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08567
Plaintiff:
Kathleen S. Walter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
