Cases 51 - 60 of 2,861
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Charles et al v. Crocker et al
as 5:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ashonta Charles, Ali Clayton, Luis Espineira and others
Defendant:
Danny Crocker, BCSFM, LLC and BCS Management Group, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloan v. Medical Staff
as 6:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Claude Gene Sloan
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Sloan v. Court
as 6:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
Claude Gene Sloan
Respondent:
Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sloan v. Court
as 7:2023cv00745
Petitioner:
Claude Sloan
Respondent:
Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
March v. Real Estate Board of New York et al
as NYS/1:23-CV-09995
Plaintiff:
March and Monty March
Defendant:
Real Estate Board of New York, Real Estate Board of New York Listing Service, Brown Harris Stevens LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
