Cases 51 - 60 of 44,702
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janet Sloan v. Sloan Construction Co, et al
as 24-1901
Plaintiff:
JANET SLOAN
Defendant:
SLOAN CONSTRUCTION CO, LEON SLOAN, SR. and SARA SLOAN, jointly and severally
David Reed v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1434
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLAN REED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Genesee County Sheriff and BRIAN D. MACMILLAN, Sr. Asst. Pros Atty/FOIA Coordinator
(UD)(PS) Liu v. McIntyre et al
as 2:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Yao Liu
Defendant:
Tiffany Angelique McIntyre and Troy Lamont Finley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Brian White, Sr. v. Sushruth Shenava
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LAMOUNT WHITE, SR.
Defendant:
SUSHRUTH SHENAVA, Medical Doctor
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Keys v. PNC Bank Headquarters
as 4:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
PNC Bank Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ONDISH v. SUPER INTENDENT HAINESWORTH et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ONDISH, SR.
Respondent:
SUPER INTENDENT HAINESWORTH and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VanDorn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanDorn, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
