Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,104
Jones v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00780
Defendant: Lt. Ecford, Officer Todd, CMC Cleveland and others
Plaintiff: Darius D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charmaine Saunders v. City of Lakeland, Florida, et al
as 24-12091
Defendant: CHRISTINA STEWART, CITY OF LAKELAND, FLORIDA, CHIEF OF POLICE, LAKELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff: CHARMAINE SAUNDERS
Unknown: SERVICE
Jean-Pierre v. Payne et al
as 1:2024cv02646
Defendant: Angela Hill, James Payne, Shakayla Saunder and others
Plaintiff: Carlos Jean-Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Sanchez-Galvan et al
as 3:2024cv01025
Plaintiff: Benny Ford
Defendant: K. Saunders, E. Sanchez-Galvan, O. Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00808
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. Saunders
as 24-60285
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Nigel Saunders
US v. Kareem Saunders
as 24-6545
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KAREEM A. SAUNDERS
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Defendant: SUSAN DOYLE, in her official capacity as DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT 13, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: ACTION NC and NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02074
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02323
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?