Cases 61 - 70 of 22,444
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
SMITH v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
DASHAAN R. SMITH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER, SGT. SIPES, SGT. VERESHACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. MAHON et al
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RENEE MAHON, JEFF DAVIDSON, JESSICA WROBLEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry, Tyrone Oliver, C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Eugene Williams
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Quachita Parish Corrections, et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Henry Ray Francis
Defendant:
Quachita Parish Corrections, Unidentified Parties, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickelberry et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv02135
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Dujana Nickelberry, Desmond Oliver and Dujuana Nickelberry
Defendant:
Darvon Marshall, Trans-Porte, Inc and Trans-Porte, Inc doing business as U.S. Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pace v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr and Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pollard, Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Wesley M Pollard, Sr.
Respondent:
Lonnie Oliver, Samuel M. Sanguedolce and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
