Cases 61 - 70 of 109
BOYER v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BOYER
Defendant:
WURLIN GRAHAM and ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz et al v. Trinity Financial Services LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz and Maria Ortiz
Defendant:
Trinity Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. B&A Diagnostic, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv24387
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Defendant:
B&A Diagnostic, Inc. , Esteban Genao , Alex Alonso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Juan Ortiz
as 14-20684
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN ANGEL ORTIZ
Ortiz v. Riggle et al
as 4:2014cv02294
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz
Defendant:
Jerre Riggle and Bricklayers Local No. 8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
US v. Ortiz-Vega
as 14-1693
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL ORTIZ-VEGA, a/k/a Kikito
Interested Party:
SCOTIABANK DE PUERTO RICO, ISRAEL TORRES-CORDERO and IRMA MARGARITA IBANEZ-GALDOS
Angel Ortiz Diamond v. MacDonald Corp et al
as 2:2014cv03825
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and MacDonald Corp
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz Diamond
Rene Ortiz a/k/a Angel Ortiz v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 14-1976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENE ORTIZ A/K/A ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Pedro Camacho-Corona v. Angel Ortiz et al
as 5:2014cv00543
Defendant:
Norman Biler, Ms. Castillo, Ms> Gepulle and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Camacho-Corona
VIKING INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
VIKING INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN
Defendant:
ANGEL ORTIZ, ANGEL CARTAGENA, JUAN SALVADOR MATOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
