Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Tarver v. Koch et al
as 3:2014cv04080
Plaintiff:
Wilfred E Tarver, II
Defendant:
Brandon Thomas Koch and Jeff Bulchwald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tilson v. Guardino et al
as 4:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Taleal Karon Tilson
Defendant:
Anna Guardino and Brandon Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. STANEK et al
as 2:2014cv01415
Plaintiff:
BRANDON THOMAS
Defendant:
DANIEL STANEK , LUPPINO CHRISTOPHER , DAN RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINSON v. THOMAS
as 5:2014cv00294
Plaintiff:
JERRICK ATKINSON
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, BRANDON THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travelers Property Casualty Co v. Justin Moore, et al
as 13-14413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN MAURICE MOORE, WILLIE THACKSTON, THE ESTATE OF BRANDON THOMAS and others
Brown v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01673
Petitioner:
Brandon Thomas Brown
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Daniel Burns and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson et al v. Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
as 3:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kassim Anderson , Cedric Bean , Edward Beck and others
Defendant:
Amsted Rail Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Brandon Thomas v. State of California, et al.,
as 5:2012cv01207
Defendant:
M. Alexi, R. Bandholtz, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thomas
Thomas v. State of California, et al.,
as 3:2012cv03584
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thomas
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, State of California, Cynthia Tampkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauss v. A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12533
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bauss
Defendant:
A-1 Bail Bond Agency, Inc., Matthew Maddock, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
