Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01061
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brooks et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03597
Plaintiff: Christina Brooks and David Brooks
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. GROUNDS
as 6:2012cv00336
Petitioner: Charles David Brooks
Respondent: Dawn E. Grounds and RICK C THALER
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. GROUNDS
as 6:2012cv00312
Petitioner: Charles David Brooks
Respondent: Dawn E. Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Dennis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00426
Plaintiff: Charles David Brooks
Defendant: Angelique Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. GROUNDS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00083
Petitioner: Charles David Brooks
Respondent: DAWN E GROUNDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Berhane
as 0:2012cv01949
Plaintiff: David Brooks
Defendant: Yemone Berhane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. GROUNDS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00076
Petitioner: Charles David Brooks
Respondent: DAWN E GROUNDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. GROUNDS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00063
Petitioner: Charles David Brooks
Respondent: DAWN E GROUNDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Grounds et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00048
Plaintiff: Charles David Brooks
Defendant: Dawn Grounds, Rodger A Mcdonald, Kelly R May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?