Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Crossan v. Collins
as 26-2035
Claimant:
IAN MICHAEL CROSSAN
Respondent:
DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Douglas v. Cargo Solution Express, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv04532
Plaintiff:
Miles Douglas
Defendant:
Cargo Solution Express, Inc. and Juan Munoz Guerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marion v. Douglas et al
as 1:2026cv04011
Plaintiff:
Erica Marion
Defendant:
Zachary Louis Douglas, Hogan Truck Leasing, LLC and Saddle Creek Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Floding et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2026cv03339
Plaintiff:
Katherine Renee Floding and Kody Lee Klimek
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Douglas County, Brock Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Torres, et al
as 26-3156
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL PEREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN TORRES, MONICA TORRES, SHANNON MARTEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BAKER v. DEDICATED SLEEP, LLC et al
as 9:2026cv80840
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS BAKER
Defendant:
DEDICATED SLEEP, LLC and JILL MARIE GLENN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Donahue v. Miles, et al.
as 26-4524
Defendant:
RICHARD L. WESENBERG, individually and as District Attorney for Douglas County, CAMERON MILES, individually and as Legal Counsel to Governor Tina Kotek, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
BLEU BLAZE DONAHUE
Molnar v. Blue Dolphin Pool Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv14259
Plaintiff:
Michael Molnar
Defendant:
Blue Dolphin Pool Service, Inc. and Douglas Fisher
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
