Cases 61 - 70 of 162
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funches v. Russo et al
as 9:2017cv01292
Plaintiff:
Trevis L. Funches
Defendant:
Anthony Russo, Blum, C. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
SHERRY JACKSON, LUTRICIA CLAY, M.B. BY NEXT FRIEND RANA PERSON and others
Defendant:
HALSTAB, LLC, HAMMOND LEAD PRODUCTS, LLC, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Funches v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv06062
Plaintiff:
Danetta Funches
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey Funches v. Chase Noland
as 17-60431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARVEY LEE FUNCHES
Defendant - Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE TRACTOR AND IMPLEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.
Allen et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Dianne Allen , Sylvia Alvarado , Stephanie Arand and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Funches v. King
as 3:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
James C. Funches
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AdCare Health Systems Inc et al v. Funches
as 4:2016cv00899
Plaintiff:
AdCare Health Systems Inc , AdCare Administrative Services LLC , AdCare Operations LLC and others
Defendant:
Albert Lee Funches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brady v. MDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00959
Plaintiff:
James Brady
Defendant:
MDOC, Marshall Fisher, Brian Ladner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funches v. Howell et al
as 1:2016cv10429
Plaintiff:
Jabari Norvell Funches
Defendant:
Goerge Howell, III, Robert Gorzelanny, Jr. and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
