Cases 61 - 70 of 298
Spence v. United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit et al
as 1:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Matey, Ginsburg, McKee and others
Plaintiff:
Levar Lee Spence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaye v. USA, et al--PER #3 ORDER PLAINTIFF AUTHORIZED TO EMAIL HIS PLEADINGS
as 1:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Mary Melfi, William Barr, Robert E Kirschman and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardiman v. McKeen et al
as 2:2019cv12949
Defendant:
Brian J. McKeen, McKeen & Associates, P.C. and William Beaumont Hospital
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hardiman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Ramius Hardiman
as 19-3441
Defendant / Appellant:
Ramius Hardiman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Hardiman v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00773
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production Inc.
Plaintiff:
Derek Kadeem Hardiman
Cryer v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv04265
Defendant:
Franklin Resources, Inc and Franklin Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cryer and Marlon H. Cryer
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nelly F. Fernandez
Consolidated Defendant:
Franklin Templeton 401(k) Retirement Plan Investment Committee, Norman Frisbie, Jennifer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Darren Johnson v. Michael Wilkinson, et al
as 19-1916
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY L. BURT, Warden, MICHAEL WILKERSON, ELISIA HARDIMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN DEON JOHNSON
King-Hardiman v. Gittere et al
as 3:2019cv00484
Petitioner:
Andre King-Hardiman
Respondent:
Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARDIMAN v. MCKINNEY
as 2:2019cv00148
Defendant:
LARRY J. MCKINNEY
Plaintiff:
WILLIE L. HARDIMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willie Hardiman v. Larry McKinney
as 19-2031
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY J. MCKINNEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE L. HARDIMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
