Cases 61 - 70 of 851
Hernandez et al v. Muncipio de San Juan et al
as 3:2022cv01655
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hernandez, Janet Matos, Helder Haddock Anaya and others
Defendant:
Muncipio de San Juan, Jose Juan Garcia, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
IRIZARRY-INGLES v. RANSOM et al
as 5:2022cv05191
Petitioner:
ERIC IRIZARRY-INGLES
Respondent:
SUP'T KEVIN J. RANSOM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Magarin v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2022cv07803
Plaintiff:
Berenise Magarin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Fidel Irizarry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Magarin v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2022cv07803
Plaintiff:
Berenise Magarin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Fidel Irizarry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Ralph Irizarry
as 22-3251
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RALPH O.R. IRIZARRY
Irizarry v. Kauffman et al
as 4:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
Jason Cisne and Angel Irizarry
Defendant:
K. Kauffman, J. Spyker, G. Ralston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01723
Petitioner:
LOURDES IRIZARRY SANTIAGO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
