Cases 61 - 70 of 262
Walker v. Streeval et al
as 0:2019cv00124
Defendant:
Isaac, Ian Connors, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Plaintiff:
James L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawson v. Dean et al
as 1:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Judge Andrew Mark Freiberg, Monica Datz, James David Cross and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dean Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Pat McTighe, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
James William Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Pat McTighe, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Montana Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
James William Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Dean et al
as 3:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Judge Andrew Mark Freiberg, Monica Datz, James David Cross and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dean Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ndukwe et al v. Walker, Jr. et al
as 1:2019cv00888
Defendant:
Jane Doe, James L. Walker, Jr., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Chinedum Ndukwe and Kingsley Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Streeval
as 0:2019cv00087
Respondent:
J. C. Streeval
Petitioner:
James L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Walker v. USBC, Riverside
as 19-71577
Respondent:
USBC, RIVERSIDE
Not Yet Classified:
ROBERT WHITMORE, Trustee and U.S. TRUSTEE
Petitioner:
JAMES LLOYD WALKER
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JAMES LLOYD WALKER
Walker v. Arnald
as 5:2019cv03526
Respondent:
Warden Eric Arnald
Petitioner:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Russell Reger v. James Walker, et al
as 19-10662
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES K. WALKER, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ANTHONY G. BROCATO and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL JAY REGER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
