Cases 61 - 70 of 553
Atwell v. Mitcham
as 1:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Atwell
Defendant:
Captain Richard Mitcham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Campbell et al v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Campbell and Kyle Evan Horvat
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schutt v. State of Tennessee et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Schutt
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Lincoln County, Tennessee, City of Fayetteville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Jason Lee
as 22-10152
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON LEE
USA v. Jason Lee
as 22-10153
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON LEE
Miri et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv11264
Plaintiff:
Anthony Louis Miri and Sharon Miri
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Jason Lee Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DENHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06216
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE DENHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
