Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Johnson v. Hamel et al
as 6:2009cv00248
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Hamel, John Crawford, H Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00767
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, James LeBlanc, Robert Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baker v. Crawford et al (INMATE2)
as 1:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Terrance Baker
Defendant:
John Crawford and Frank Meredith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pitre v. Cain et al
as 2:2008cv01894
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Pitre
Defendant:
Nathan Cain and John Crawford, Dr
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baker v. Crawford et al (INMATE2)
as 1:2008cv00612
Plaintiff:
Terrance Baker
Defendant:
John Crawford and Frank Meredith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv02294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Damore v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01387
Plaintiff:
Vito Damore, Vito Damore, Vito Damore and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAHR, SR. v. HANLON et al
as 1:2007cv00531
Plaintiff:
RANDALL I. LAHR, SR.
Defendant:
THOMAS HANLON, DAVID SGT. JENKINS, MICHEAL LAFABIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damore v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv00289
Plaintiff:
Vito Damore, Vito Damore, Vito Damore and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
