Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Moore v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00041
Petitioner:
Joseph William Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Holder
as 11-932
Petitioner:
Joseph Tamba Moore
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Mooring #539392 v. Curtin
as 1:2011cv00189
Respondent:
Cindi Curtin
Petitioner:
Joseph Ryan Mooring #539392
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. PNS Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
Joseph T. Moore
Defendant:
PNS Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Encompass Indemnity Company v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Encompass Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Kathy Smith and Joseph H Moore
Counter_claimant:
Joseph H Moore
Counter_defendant:
Encompass Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mooring v. Henderson et al
as 1:2010cv02150
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Mooring
Defendant:
Gary Dean Henderson and Howard Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOORE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76460
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH G. MOORE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Tetra Financial Group v. West Virginia Auto Center et al
as 2:2009cv00961
Plaintiff:
Tetra Financial Group
Defendant:
West Virginia Auto Center, Joseph B. Moore, Christopher M. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Moore, et al v. LA-Z-Boy, Inc., et al
as 09-2232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. MOORE, d/b/a CNT Deliveries, JAMES HEMBROUGH, d/b/a J&L Deliveries, RICHARD P. GARVEY, d/b/a R&J Deliveries and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LA-Z-BOY, INC., CARL HARZ FURNITURE,INC., a/k/a Carl Harz Furniture Co.,Inc., a/k/a Carl Harz Fine Furniture, NICHOLAS HARZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
