Cases 61 - 70 of 2,397
Amanda Wilde v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wilde
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Social Services, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Ambrx Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
John Carroll
Defendant:
Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Stephen Glover, Daniel O'Connor and others
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Rigdon et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach Services, Inc. and Kate Spade, LLC
Defendant:
Jo Ann Sanders Rigdon, Sheri E. Sanders Smith, The Pink Daisy Market, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jardine v. Ambrx Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
James Jardine
Defendant:
Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Stephen Glover, Daniel O'Connor and others
Pariti et al v. McGowan et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jay Pariti and Priyanka Pariti
Defendant:
Dr. Kevin McGowan, Allison C. Rioux Kleckner, Tara O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricketts v. Black et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kate Ricketts, Kelsey Vanscyoc and Kate Ricketts
Defendant:
Ryan Richard Black, Hocking County, Ohio and Ryan R. Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Everingham v. Arcadia Publishing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Kate Everingham
Defendant:
Arcadia Publishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Koko v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Egobundu Kate Koko
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
