Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 497
Nundahl, Garrett v. Dickman, Ashley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00289
Defendant: Ashley T. Dickman, Wisconsin Department Of Corrections and Jennifer L. King
Plaintiff: Garrett Lue Nundahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12090
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: SHANIKA L KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Serieux v. Heyliger et al
as 3:2021cv00004
Defendant: D. Rhymer, Mr. L. King, Chinnery and others
Plaintiff: Francis B Serieux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00079
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kenneth L. King, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
King v. Connor et al
as 4:2021cv00076
Defendant: Sgt. Orris J. Talley, Billy M. Lewis, Bryan Collier and others
Plaintiff: Vonice L King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00810
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Canton Ohio Police Department, et al.
as 5:2020cv02648
Plaintiff: Deny L. King
Defendant: Canton Ohio Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis King v. Arthur Burton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-7682
Defendant / Appellee: MARY MONTOUTH, Grievance Coordinator, ASSOCIATE WARDEN ARTHUR BURTON and BRYAN STIRLING
Plaintiff / Appellant: CURTIS L. KING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?