Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Lohmann v. USA
as 4:2011cv00153
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua Lohmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Day v. Zim's Parts World, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv02771
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Day
Defendant:
Zim's Parts World, Inc., Sandra J. Briscoe and Keith A. Lohmann
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia et al v. Covidien Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04184
Plaintiff:
Claudia Garcia and Maria Garcia
Defendant:
Covidien Inc. , Anchor Products Company, Inc. , Ochsner Medical Center - Westbank, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Lohmann et al v. Maesbury Homes, Inc.
as 6:2010cv01241
Plaintiff:
Michael A Lohmann and Karen Lupton
Defendant:
Maesbury Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Tex Pat, LLC v. Xylos Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Tex Pat, LLC
Defendant:
Xylos Corporation, Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH and Co. KG and Lohmann & Rauscher, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEASEWEAR TEXTILE RENTALS v. LOHMANN THERAPY SYSTEMS CORP. (LTS)
as 5:2010cv01004
Plaintiff:
LEASEWEAR TEXTILE RENTALS
Defendant:
LOHMANN THERAPY SYSTEMS CORP. (LTS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Hartmann et al
as 0:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans and Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Defendant:
Luverna Hartmann, Keith Hartmann, Kathleen Hoese and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-6277
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Legrano v. US Department of Justice, et al
as 09-2423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LEGRANO
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, DAVID L. WINN, Warden and others
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SUSAN MILLER, Rehabilitative Services Provider
USA v. Joshua Lohmann
as 09-10217
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSHUA LOHMANN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
