Cases 61 - 70 of 169
Sacerdote et al v. Retirement Plan Committee et al
as 1:2017cv08834
Defendant:
Retirement Plan Committee, Michael Burke, NYU Langone Hospitals and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Sacerdote , Herbert Samuels , Mark Crispin Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Miller v. Yellow Pages et al
as 3:2017cv02264
Plaintiff:
Mark L. Miller
Defendant:
Yellow Pages , YP , AT&T Advertising and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Miller
as 1:2017cv07473
Plaintiff:
Christina M Miller
Defendant:
Mark E Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Miller
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Knox v. Hooper's Crab House, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01853
Plaintiff:
Casey Knox , Mark Joseph Miller , Krista Perrino and others
Defendant:
Hooper's Crab House, Inc. , Pete Shepard , Royette Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Joseph Platt, et al v. Board Of Commissioners, et al
as 17-3461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH J. PLATT, PLATT FOR JUDGE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and MARK W. MILLER
Defendant:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT
Defendant - Appellee:
MAUREEN O'CONNOR, RICHARD A. DOVE and SCOTT J. DREXEL
Miller v. Rutherford County Sheriff Department
as 3:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Miller
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller
as 7:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mark Weldon Miller
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Medenwald v. Alutto et al
as 1:2016cv11270
Defendant:
Charles A. Alutto, Daniel V Ginnetti, Frank J.M. ten Brink and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Medenwald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
