Cases 61 - 70 of 34,117
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50223
Plaintiff:
Justn Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marquez et al v. Federal Emergency Management
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Spring Victoria Marquez, Diane Lee Martinez, Rico Martinez and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
Noelia Martinez
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Martinez
as 24-1537
Defendant:
LUIS MARTINEZ, Noel, Noelly and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martinez Chavelas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3550
Petitioner:
ANGELICA MARTINEZ CHAVELAS, ANARELI CASTRO MARTINEZ and JESUS MANUEL CASTRO MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mclean
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Martinez M Edwards
Defendant:
Joseph A Mclean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LULAC v. Abbott
as 24-50449
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas
Curtis Robinson v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04710
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Oscar Rangel Salinas, MARK E RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
