Cases 61 - 70 of 42,407
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02547
Plaintiff:
Valda Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Terrance Moore
as 24-1441
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TERRANCE JAMAL MOORE
Tanisha Moore v. Stephen M. Lowry et al
as 2:2024mc00068
Petitioner:
Tanisha Moore
Respondent:
Stephen M. Lowry, Armando Duron, Kimberly Dotson and others
Cubic v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jose Cubic
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Willey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Segundo Adams
Defendant:
James O. Willey, F. L. Moore & Sons, Inc. and National Interstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Moore v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01300
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Leroy Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jallal v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Jallad
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, sec.gov/Chair Gary Gensler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Moore *RESTRICTED FILER* v. Monroe County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Garry Lee Moore *RESTRICTED FILER*
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Facility, Monroe County, MS, Board of Supervisors, Kevon Crook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS v. HIRSCH et al
as 5:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans
Respondent:
Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon, Stacy Eggers IV and others
Intervenor:
Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
