Cases 61 - 70 of 792
Dugar III v. Smith
as 3:2021cv08905
Plaintiff:
Ernest Dugar III
Defendant:
Susie P Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUNENKANT v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv02984
Plaintiff:
JON L BRUNENKANT and JON L. BRUNENKANT
Defendant:
JOSEPH P. SMITH, JOSEPH J. GRILLO, JOSEPH P HICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinship Partners, Inc. v. Embark Veterinary, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01631
Plaintiff:
Kinship Partners, Inc.
Defendant:
Embark Veterinary, Inc. and Robin P. Smith
Edwards v. Hunter et al
as 1:2021cv03498
Plaintiff:
Emerson Jimel Edwards
Defendant:
E. Hunter, P Smith and Mike Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Hooper et al
as 3:2021cv00612
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Simms
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper, L. Ramsey, J. Mancheser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEACOCK et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv18762
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF PATRICIA M. PEACOCK and LAURA P. SMITH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Verdun v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Verdun, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael P. Smith, Brian Morland, Rebecca Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AZUBUKO v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2021cv02450
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant:
VANESSA L. BRYANT and THOMAS P. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
SMITH JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50310
Plaintiff:
EDDIE P SMITH JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. SCOTT et al
as 3:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
VICTOR O ROBINSON, SR and V O ROBINSON, SR
Defendant:
LAMONTE E SCOTT, LAMONTE E SCOTT LAW FIRM, PHILLIP M BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
