Cases 61 - 70 of 111
HARRISON v. SAUNDERS
as 1:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. HARRISON
Defendant:
SORRELL SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33231
Plaintiff:
Lucy R. Harrison
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Weller et al
as 1:2013cv01243
Plaintiff:
James R. Harrison
Defendant:
John P. Weller , Weller Tile & Mosaics, Inc. and R J Weller Tile & Marble, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Harrison et al
as 8:2013cv02546
Plaintiff:
James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Dale R. Harrison and Rex W. Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Glenda R. Harrison
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bobinger et al v. TIN, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bobinger, Sr. , Dianne E. Dixon , Albert J. Grelle, Sr. and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc. and International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bobinger et al v. TIN, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bobinger, Sr. , Dianne E. Dixon , Albert J. Grelle, Sr. and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc. and International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Harrison et al
as 2:2012cv00031
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jimmie R. Harrison, Marlene Harrison and West Virginia Tax Department
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Berlan Dicey v. W. Harrison, et al
as 12-15606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERLAN LYNELL DICEY
Defendant - Appellee:
A. PFADT and W. R. HARRISON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
