Cases 61 - 70 of 142
Marshall v. Davenport et al
as 7:2013cv00683
Petitioner:
Rick R Marshall
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benny Ford v. USA
as 13-70938
:
In re: BENNY FORD
Petitioner:
BENNY FORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Real Party In Interest:
G. WILDEY, Correctional Officer, R. MARSHALL, Correctional Officer and L. BONIFASCIO, Licensed Vocational Nurse
Bradley Marshall v. Stephen Purcell
as 13-1045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY R. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN L. PURCELL, JENNIFER GEE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Bradley Marshall v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al
as 12-35523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY R. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF WSBA, STANLEY A SEBASTIAN and others
Marshall et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02077
Plaintiff:
Natalie C. Marshall and David R. Marshall
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patten v. Durkin et al
as 1:2012cv04285
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Patten
Defendant:
Michael Durkin , Patrick Felker , Mui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Antonetti v. James Cox, et al
as 12-15798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES COX, E. K. MCDANIELS, DON HELLING and others
GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc. v. Bowles et al
as 4:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc.
Defendant:
Lee Bowles, Anthony R. Marshall and Star Mine Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Payne v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Myron A. Payne
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James E. Tilton, Tom Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thon v. Marshall
as 12-390
Petitioner - Appellant:
Frank Thon
Respondent - Appellee:
Louis R. Marshall
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
