Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Washington v. Doran et al
as 3:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Kaas Doran, Michael McCloskey, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Jones (Robert Washington)
as 12-5047
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Hartman and Moses Jones, AKA Ray, AKA Faheem Hasan, AKA Ray Jones, AKA James Mount, AKA Moses Walter
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Washington, AKA Blood
United States of America v. Jones (Robert Washington)
as 12-5047
Appellant:
Robert Washington, AKA Blood
Defendant:
Moses Jones, AKA Ray, AKA Faheem Hasan, AKA Ray Jones, AKA James Mount, AKA Moses Walter and Brandon Hartman
Appellee:
United States of America
Washington v. Atchison
as 1:2012cv10236
Petitioner:
Robert Washington
Respondent:
Mike Atchison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Washington v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv04322
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Gabriel Lobato and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
In re: Robert Washington
as 12-1299
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT WASHINGTON
Respondent:
DA PHILADELPHIA
Edwards et al v. Crossroads RV, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Mark Edwards , Flossie Magee , Eric Thompson and others
Defendant:
Crossroads RV, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards et al v. Crossroads RV, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Edwards , All Plaintiffs , Flossie Magee and others
Defendant:
Crossroads RV, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv15511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Francis-El v. Bland
as 8:2011cv03222
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington Francis-El
Defendant:
Marilynn M. Bland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
