Cases 61 - 70 of 2,619
TC Marina Del Rey, LLC v. Kenneth King et al
as 2:2023cv10205
Plaintiff:
TC Marina Del Rey, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth P. King and Does 1 to 10 Inclusive
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv03303
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnson, Moses Stancil, Plannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
D. Diaz v. Michel Rey Moore et al
as 2:2023cv10018
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dos-Reis, et al v. Garland
as 23-1981
Petitioner:
DEVANI DOS-REIS, IVANETE FERREIRA DOS SANTOS-REIS, L.F.D.S.R. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Moreno v. Rey
as 2:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ian Moreno
Defendant:
Mrs. Storm Rey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wang v. Quiros
as 23-7800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISHAN WANG
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGEL QUIROS, Commissioner, Department of Correction (DOC) State of Connecticut, NED LAMONT, Governer, State of Connecticut (CT), REIS, Warden, Cheshire Correctional Institution (CCI) DOC, CT and others
Boone v. Allison, et al.
as 23-3605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VELTON LAMONT BOONE
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden RON DAVIS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Doe v. Santa Fe Public Schools et al
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Santa Fe Public Schools, Robert Apodaca, Candice Flint and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
