Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-3542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry D. May, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Brooks Parks, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC and others
Williams v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry D May, Brooks Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Michael Steven King v. A Hedgepeth
as 2:2011cv07517
Respondent:
A Hedgepeth
Petitioner:
Michael Steven King
King v. B.F. Saul Mortgage Co et al
as 3:2010cv01749
Plaintiff:
Steven King
Defendant:
B.F. Saul Mortgage Co , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc, Specialized Loan Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
White v. Morgan et al
as 1:2010cv01804
Plaintiff:
Melton White
Defendant:
Julie E. Morgan, Gerald L. Mack, Sue Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv01794
Plaintiff:
John T. Price
Defendant:
State of Alabama, William Cole, John Geer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Heather et al
as 3:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Steven King
Defendant:
Deputy Heather, Warden Julie Lawson, Sheriff Canarecci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southeastern Legal Foundation,, et al v. EPA
as 10-1035
Petitioner:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., The Langdale Company, Langdale Forest Products Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Union of Concerned Scientists
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
