Cases 61 - 70 of 503
(PS)Katumbusi v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Kathleen Leslie Hrepich, Vander E. Hardy-Porter, Kathleen Leslie Hrepich-Jonas and others
Plaintiff:
Fatima A. Katumbusi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pemberton v. Anderson et al
as 0:2018cv02818
Defendant:
John D. Buck, Sarena S. Lin, Tim Rogan and others
Plaintiff:
Sally Pemberton
BECON MEDICAL, LTD. v. BARTLETT et al
as 2:2018cv04169
Defendant:
TALEXMEDICAL, LLC and SCOTT P. BARTLETT
Plaintiff:
BECON MEDICAL, LTD. and HENRY STEPHENSON BYRD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hobson v. Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison et al
as 3:2018cv00838
Defendant:
Scott P. Tift, Joshua A. Frank and Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison
Plaintiff:
Faye Rennell Hobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Harrington #L13 et al
as 1:2018cv05592
Defendant:
Robert W. Purvis, John A. Gartner, Parole Agent Walls #L77 and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Hill and Charles Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Albaugh et al
as 1:2018cv00564
Plaintiff:
Phyliss Davis
Defendant:
Scott P. Albaugh and Cassens Transport Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Presley et al v. JT International Distributors, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01185
Plaintiff:
Scott P Presley and Hilary Presley
Defendant:
JT International Distributors, Inc. and Chick Harness & Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Duoyuan Printing, Inc.
as 18-990
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Richard Pearson, Joseph E. Sciarro, Jeff Perry, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Duoyuan Printing, Inc., Wenhua Guo, Xiqing Diao and others
Defendant:
Baiyun Sun and James Zhang
Defendant - Appellant:
Piper Jaffray & Co. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv02881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
